Observability Cost Reduction: A Practical Guide

What makes observability costs so high?

Observability costs tend to balloon because several factors compound across infrastructure, data handling, and tooling. The main cost drivers are:

High Data Volume

• Massive log/event streams – Microservices, containers, and distributed architectures produce huge amounts of logs, metrics, and traces.
• Duplicate or noisy data – Debug-level logs, repeated error messages, or verbose traces inflate storage without adding real value.
• Unbounded cardinality – High-cardinality dimensions (e.g., user_id, session_id) cause explosive growth in time series count and index size.

Retention and storage costs

• Long retention periods – Keeping raw telemetry for weeks or months multiplies storage requirements.
• Expensive storage tiers – Many observability platforms store data in fast-access, high-cost systems instead of cheaper archival tiers.
• Indexing overhead – Searchable indexes for logs and traces require extra space and processing power.

Data ingestion and processing overhead

• Unfiltered ingestion – Ingesting everything (including non-critical debug logs) means paying for unnecessary data.
• Complex transformations – Enrichment, parsing, and schema mapping consume compute resources before the data is even stored.
• Real-time pipelines – Low-latency streaming architectures (e.g., Kafka + processing engines) cost more to run than batch systems.

Query and analysis costs

• High query concurrency – Multiple teams running frequent ad-hoc queries spike compute usage.
• Complex searches – Joins, regex, and large time-window queries consume CPU and memory.
• Non-optimized queries – Poor query practices can scan more data than necessary, inflating cost.

Tooling and licensing

• Per-GB or per-metric pricing – Many vendors charge based on ingestion or storage volume, so uncontrolled growth hits budgets fast.
• Multiple overlapping tools – Using separate APM, logging, and metrics platforms can duplicate data and costs.
• Premium features – Advanced AI analytics, anomaly detection, or long-term retention often require higher-tier plans.

Operational complexity

• Multi-cloud duplication – Collecting and storing telemetry separately in each cloud increases spend.
• Redundant pipelines – Poor consolidation leads to parallel ingestion paths doing the same work.
• Overprovisioning for peak load – Scaling for worst-case ingestion rates wastes resources during normal operation.

Organic growth

Organic growth makes observability costs rise because as your system naturally scales - without any single “big bang” expansion - you quietly accumulate more telemetry sources, more data, and more complexity over time. The spend creeps up because the increase is gradual and often unmonitored. Each new microservice, container, or function you deploy adds logs, metrics, and traces to collect. More customers mean more requests, transactions, and interactions to observe. With organic scaling, you often add identifiers - such as new regions, tenants, SKUs, or customer IDs - into observability tags. And as the system grows, teams tend to keep the same retention defaults (e.g., 30–90 days of logs) without questioning whether all new data streams need it.

Telemetry complexity

Telemetry complexity increases observability costs because the more diverse, enriched, and interconnected your telemetry becomes, the more expensive it is to collect, store, process, and query. It’s not just more data - it’s more complicated data, which drives up both infrastructure and vendor bills. Teams end up with multiple telemetry types to manage, and all of it has to be enriched and linked. And typically that data is in multiple protocols and formats requiring different sampling strategies and retention policies, all of which add to challenge time and difficulty involved in management. 

Increased expectations

Increased expectations drive observability costs up because as organizations demand faster insights, deeper coverage, and higher reliability, the observability system has to do more in terms of data volume, data freshness, retention, and analytical capability, all of which come with a price tag. Teams expect full-resolution data instead of sampled or aggregated views, so they keep every log line, metric, and trace which removes natural cost controls. Stakeholders want the ability to look back weeks or months for trend analysis, compliance, or security investigations, and that can require hot or searchable storage which is expensive. And, as expectations grow, observability expands from core infrastructure and services to  literally everything in the enterprise, which increases the number of data sources, formats, and pipelines that must be supported, and each adds ingestion, parsing, and indexing overhead.

Technical cost drivers of the tool

Technical cost drivers of the observability tool itself increase costs because they’re tied to how the platform is built and priced, not just how much telemetry you send it. Even with the same data volume, one tool’s architecture, pricing model, and operational demands can make observability significantly more expensive.

Pricing models and licensing structures can vary wildly.

• Per-GB ingestion pricing – Costs scale directly with data volume, so spikes in logs, traces, or metrics translate instantly into higher bills.
• Per-host / per-container pricing – Penalizes horizontal scaling in microservices or Kubernetes.
• Per-metric or time series pricing – High-cardinality tags and labels inflate metric counts, pushing you into higher tiers.
• Feature-based pricing – Premium capabilities (e.g., anomaly detection, longer retention, AIOps) are often add-ons.

How the data is indexed and the storage is designed can also impact costs.

• Full-index storage – Platforms that index all telemetry fields have higher storage and CPU demands, even for fields rarely queried.
• Columnar vs. inverted index trade-offs – Some architectures are optimized for search speed but require much more storage.
• Hot-only storage – If the tool keeps all data in expensive, low-latency storage rather than tiering to cheaper cold storage, retention costs spike.

And the ingestion pipeline can bring significant overhead with it.

• Vendor-side enrichment – Adding tags, parsing, and transforming data at ingestion increases payload size and indexing load.
• Protocol & format handling – Supporting multiple formats (OpenTelemetry, syslog, JSON, proprietary) can add processing costs before data is query-ready.
• Real-time SLAs – Low-latency pipelines require more compute and memory, increasing operational cost.

Data transitions are painful

Data transitions increase observability costs because every time telemetry moves between stages, formats, storage tiers, or systems, there’s extra compute, storage, and sometimes licensing overhead. In observability pipelines, these transitions happen constantly - from collection to transformation to storage to analysis - and each one can add hidden cost layers.

Telemetry often needs to be parsed, normalized, or re-encoded to match the observability tool’s ingestion format and these conversions require CPU and memory, especially for high-volume streams like Kubernetes pod logs. Larger converted payloads can increase ingestion and storage costs if compression isn’t applied efficiently. Switching between protocols means extra processing and network transfers. Moving data from hot (fast, expensive) to warm or cold (slower, cheaper) storage often involves a full rewrite of data in a new format. And these re-indexing or re-compaction jobs are resource-heavy and can temporarily spike infrastructure costs.

What opportunity is there for observability cost reduction?

There’s a lot of opportunity to reduce observability costs but the biggest wins come from tackling the problem before the data hits expensive storage and query engines. You can think of cost reduction opportunities in four layers: data creation, data movement, data storage, and data usage.

Start by preventing costs before it starts by practicing logging discipline, selective instrumentation, sampling and cardinality control, all of which will reduce ingestion cost at the source. Then optimize data movement and processing through pre-ingestion filtering, aggregation, edge processing and protocol efficiency to cut network egress fees, ingestion computer and vendor charges. Manage storage and retention by choosing tiered storage, per-source retention policies, practicing compression and deduplication and avoiding double storage - avoiding hot storage alone can save 30% to 50%! And finally, improve data usage efficiency by paying attention to query costs, practicing dashboard hygiene, tuning alerts and consolidating across tools to eliminate wasted compute cycles and query execution costs.

Teams can also “pull” some strategic cost levers including negotiating with vendors, considering an open source/hybrid approach or implementing a shaping layer to enforce filtering, sampling and enrichment rules before vendor ingestion.

Common issues and pitfalls of observability reduction strategies

Reducing observability costs is important, but if it’s done without careful planning, it can backfire leading to blind spots, slow investigations, or broken compliance guarantees. The common pitfalls come from cutting costs in ways that reduce the value of the telemetry more than the cost savings justify.

The biggest issues include:

Overly aggressive data reduction: sampling too much, dropping “unimportant” logs or cardinality pruning without awareness can lead to loss of critical observability detail, slower MTTR, and more “unknown cause” incidents.

Breaking investigations with short retention: over-trimming hot storage, long retrieval delays and security and compliance risks could result in investigations that stall or fail when incidents fall outside short retention windows.

Hidden complexity from tool consolidation: feature loss, migration overhead and partial integration could lower license costs but cause higher operational costs and user frustration.

Unintended performance bottlenecks: overloaded collectors, pipeline latency and query slowdowns may result in delayed alerting, slower RCA, and unhappy engineers.

Lack of stakeholder buy-in: engineering resistance, siloed decision making and missed cultural shifts can allow shadow telemetry pipelines to emerge, costs to creep back up, and trust to erode.

Poor change management: with no A/B testing, the lack of a rollback plan and incomplete documentation, teams can experience irreversible data loss and firefighting during incidents.

Vendor lock-in risks: proprietary filtering or tiering and limited export formats can create a situation where future flexibility is sacrificed for short-term cost wins.

Practical ways to reduce costs

Here’s a structured list of practical, field-tested ways to reduce observability costs while preserving the visibility you need.

To reduce data creation at the source, make sure the team has:

• Right-size logging levels
  
  • Use INFO and WARN for production defaults; enable DEBUG only temporarily.
  • Remove repetitive or verbose logs (e.g., full request/response bodies).
• Targeted instrumentation
  
  • Trace only the most business-critical services or endpoints.
  • Use conditional tracing for specific user journeys or error cases.
• Cardinality control
  
  • Avoid embedding unique IDs (e.g., user_id, session_id) in metrics labels unless essential.
  • Use bucketing for values like latency instead of unique numbers.
• Smart sampling
  
  • Head-based sampling to limit trace intake volume.
  • Tail-based sampling to retain traces for rare or high-error cases.
• Error budget for logs
  
  • Cap logs per second per service to prevent runaway logging during incidents.

In order to optimize data movement and processing, implement:

• Pre-ingestion filtering
  
  • Use collectors (e.g., OpenTelemetry Collector, Fluent Bit, Mezmo pipelines) to drop low-value logs before they hit your vendor.
• Data aggregation
  
  • Summarize raw metrics into roll-ups (e.g., per-minute averages) instead of sending every raw point.
• Edge enrichment
  
  • Enrich telemetry at the source to avoid vendor-side transformation charges.
• Efficient encoding
  
  • Use binary formats like OTLP over JSON to cut bandwidth and storage size.
• Dynamic routing
  
  • Send high-value telemetry to your premium tool and bulk/low-priority data to cheaper object storage (S3, GCS).

Manage storage and retention thoughtfully through:

• Tiered storage policies
  
  • Hot storage for 7–14 days, warm storage for 30–90 days, and cold/archive for long-term compliance data.
• Service-based retention
  
  • Shorten retention for ephemeral workloads; keep longer for mission-critical systems.

• Compression & deduplication

• Compress logs before storage; remove redundant fields or repeated lines.

• Avoid double storage

Improve data usage efficiency by implementing:

• Query cost awareness

• Educate engineers on query patterns that minimize full-dataset scans (use indexes, filters, and narrow time ranges).

• Dashboard hygiene
  
  • Remove unused or redundant dashboards that continuously re-run expensive queries.
• Alert tuning
  
  • Reduce noisy alerts; consolidate related alerts into single intelligent triggers.
• Self-service guidelines
  
  • Publish internal playbooks on how to pull telemetry without causing excessive load.

Take strategic and structural moves that ensure:

• Vendor contract alignment
  
  • Negotiate pricing models (per-GB vs. per-host vs. per-metric) that fit your architecture and growth pattern.
• Tool consolidation
  
  • Reduce overlap between APM, log analytics, and metrics tools — or integrate via a single ingestion pipeline.
• Hybrid storage model
  
  • Store raw/full-fidelity data in your own low-cost store; send only enriched or recent data to the observability vendor.
• Cost governance
  
  • Implement budgets and usage alerts for telemetry spend, just like for cloud compute.

Understand what’s required and remove useless data

Before cutting anything it’s important to define what “required” means to your organization. Then build a “value vs. cost” score for each stream, find the useless or low value data quickly, and decide on the reduction action by signal type. Make sure to change safely by testing, measuring, and then rolling back if necessary. Have a retention and tiering policy that’s minimal but effective and governance that actually sticks. Also decide what to monitor while the team is busy reducing.

Need a “quick wins” checklist? Here are 7 things to do first:

• Drop health/heartbeat and success logs.

• Truncate stack traces and payload fields.

• Remove never-queried index fields.

• Tail-sample traces for errors/slow paths; 5–10% baseline.

• Collapse per-pod metrics to per-service; fix label sprawl.

• Set hot retention to 14d (app logs) with explicit exceptions only.

• Kill stale dashboards/alerts (>60d unused).

Utilize data transformation

You can use data transformation as a cost-reduction technique by reshaping telemetry before it reaches expensive hot storage or query engines. This keeps the signal while shedding bulk, duplication, and expensive cardinality. Done right, it lets you preserve investigative value while slashing GB/day, unique series, and indexing overhead.

Simplify data storage optimization

Here’s a simple, battle-tested way to optimize storage for observability without drowning in knobs. Think “fewer tiers, clearer rules, zero drama.”

1) Adopt a 3-tier model (and stop there)

2) Retention by service class, not by team whim

3) Store right shape in the right tier

4) Index only what you actually query

5) Automate lifecycle moves (ILM/GLACIER-style)

6) Downsample and compact on schedule

7) Make rehydration boring (and cheap)

8) Prevent double-paying for the same GB

9) Establish guardrails that keep you safe

10) Try this simple 30/60/90-day rollout: 

Day 0–30

• Classify services (Gold/Silver/Bronze).
• Cap hot retention to class defaults.
• Limit hot indexes to 10 fields.
• Start metrics downsampling job.

Day 31–60

• Enable ILM + object storage lifecycle.
• Convert cold logs/traces to Parquet with partitioning.
• Add daily compaction + dedup.
• Ship trace exemplars and route histograms to warm.

Day 61–90

• Remove unused index fields.
• Tighten warm retention per class.
• Add rehydration runbook + automated temp-index TTL.
• Turn on spend/unit dashboards: $/GB, $/req, $/team.

‍